Résumé
Introduction: Automatic drug dispensers are now widely used in critical care.1-2 They can provide information about dispensed drugs. Good practice in sedation restricts the use of sedatives and titrates doses to defined responses.3-4 Objectives: To extract drug dispenser issuing records for sedatives and link these to patient records to evaluate sedative use. Method(s): in October 2019, we introduced two Omnicell XT automated dispensing cabinets (Omnicell inc. CA, USA) into a 42 bedded general/neurological unit. ICNARC (Intensive care national audit and research centre) and CCMDS (Critical care minimum data set) data was collected using the Ward Watcher program. Dispenser issuing records for alfentanil, propofol and midazolam were obtained as Excel files for 13 months from January 2020. Output time stamps were converted to dates and times. Outputs were linked to outputs of the ICNARC and CCMDS records for the patients that the drugs were issued to. All the outputs had patients identified by their unique hospital numbers. These were used in Excel "power queries" to produce a spread sheet with a single row per patient. Multiple admissions used the first diagnosis, the final outcome and the total length of stay. The total dose of sedatives was calculated from ampoule dose and number. The duration of treatment was calculated from the first and last issues of the drug. ICNARC codes were used to identify the primary system in the admission diagnostic code and those patients admitted for COVID-19. Variables were compared using Chi Squared, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis Tests. The significance of associations was established using Spearman's Rho. Linear regression was used to define relationships more clearly. Result(s): Table one summarises the patient characteristics with respect to all admissions during the study period and for patients who had had the studied drugs issued to them. Midazolam was used in fewer patients, they were more likely to be male, heavier (p>0001) and to die than patients receiving Propofol or Alfentanil (p>0.001). With respect to diagnostic groups, all the sedatives, particularly Midazolam (p<0.001), were more likely to be used in patients with COVID-19. The relationship between the dose of sedative drugs and patient age and weight was explored using the dose per advanced respiratory day. All three drugs had a significant but weak negative relationship with age, lower doses being given to older people (Propofol r2 = 0.02, p=0.01. Alfentanil r2 = 0.04, p=0.00. Midazolam r2 = 0.07, p=0.00.). There was also a weak but significant relationship between increasing dose of Propofol with patient weight (r2 = 0.02, p=0.01), but there was no relation between weight and doses of the other drugs. Conclusion(s): Information from automatic drug dispensers can be interpreted and combined with other datasets to produce clinically relevant information. The limited weak relationships between drug dose and age and weight suggests that sedative drugs could have been better titrated to response.